≈ 0.7–1.0 suggests efficient spend; << 0.5 is weak; > 1.0 is strong but rare.
ARR_t $2.6M vs ARR_{t−1} $2.2M → ΔARR = $0.4M. Prior quarter S&M = $0.5M → Magic = (0.4×4)/0.5 = 3.2.
Using bookings not ARR; ignoring seasonality; not lagging S&M spend one quarter.
Financials slide footnote with CAC, payback, and magic number for completeness.
Magic 3.2 (ARR growth vs prior S&M spend).